Kim Kardashianmade the confusing statement this week thatShe is convinced that the 1969 moon landing was a sophisticated deception.
Justifying her belief in the conspiracy theory, thereality TVStar said: “There is no gravity on the moon – why is the flag moving?”
The shoes displayed in the museum, which they wore on the moon, have a different footprint compared to the photographs. Why are there no stars?
Regrettably for Kim, there are three crucial pieces of evidence that establishNASAThe Apollo 11 mission was genuine.
In an interview with the Daily Mail, experts state that we must examine the scientific instruments left by astronauts, the 380 kilograms of rock they collected, and the 8,400 photos that are openly accessible from their time there.
Dr. Greg Brown, an astronomer at the Royal Observatory Greenwich, said to the Daily Mail: ‘From theSecond World Warforward, rocket technology existed that was at least theoretically able to reach the Moon.
But the technology to counterfeit it did not.
Although it may seem unusual, the simplest method to simulate the Moon landings would have been to shoot them on-site.
1. Gear located on the moon
When the Apollo 11 mission touched down on the moon in 1969, astronauts Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin did not depart the lunar surface in its original state.
Each NASA expedition to the moon’s surface has resulted in a path of discarded landers, rovers, and different scientific instruments.
Although these are hard to observe from Earth, newer missions have verified their continued existence.
In 2011, the Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter produced the most detailed map of the moon to date, generating hundreds of terabytes of imagery.
The spacecraft has captured images of three Apollo landing locations – Apollo 12, 14, and 17 – with an extraordinary degree of precision.
In images of the Apollo 12 landing area, you can clearly spot the astronauts’ footprints, which have remained intact on the airless lunar terrain for many years.
Dr. Brown states, “This visual representation has been confirmed by organizations globally, not solely by NASA and the United States.”
If that wasn’t sufficient, you might examine the data collected by the scientific instruments that astronauts placed.
Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, and 16 each placed seismic instruments on the Moon to track how asteroid impacts’ vibrations moved through the lunar surface.
This information played a crucial role in enhancing our knowledge about the moon’s makeup and origin.
However, most importantly, Apollo 11 placed a device known as the lunar laser ranging retroreflector array, which is basically a big mirror.
“These continue to be utilized today for accurately measuring the distance to the Moon by reflecting laser light off them and calculating the time it takes for the beam to return,” states Dr. Brown.
‘It is these measurements that revealed that the Moon is moving very slowly away from the Earth at around the rate your fingernails grow!’
2. Lunar rocks
In addition to leaving items behind, NASA astronauts also brought numerous mementos back with them after returning from the moon.
In total, throughout all the Apollo missions, NASA has retrieved 382 kilograms of moon rock and material.
These rocks have been sent to laboratories across the globe for examination, including to laboratories in Russia and China, which would have been eager to demonstrate the landings were a fraud.
Dr. Brown states, “The analysis has revealed that the moon’s makeup is somewhat comparable to Earth in certain aspects, but it also exhibits significant distinctions.”
Lunar rocks have a unique mix of minerals and isotopes that differ from those on Earth, indicating they originated from outside our planet.
Researchers can also analyze these samples alongside so-called lunar meteorites, which are fragments of rock that have reached Earth following their removal from the Moon.
Today, these samples may now becompared to lunar rocks collected by China’s Chang’e–5 and Chang’e–6 missions.
At no point in the five decades these rocks have been available for study has anyone found evidence that they didn’t come from the moon.
Furthermore, the moon rocks collected by NASA serve as the foundation for our scientific understanding of the moon.
The evidence that the moon possesses rocks that are similar yet slightly different from those on Earth implies they could share a common source.
This has provided backing to the idea that the Moon probablycreated by a collision between the early Earth and a planet roughly the size of Mars“when the Earth was still largely molten,” says Dr. Brown.
3. It would have been almost impossible to counterfeit
One of the most compelling proofs that the moon landings actually took place is the sheer difficulty involved in faking them.
Dr. Brown states, “In an era dominated by AI visuals and special effects, it’s often easy to overlook the fact that, not long ago, creating realistic footage of individuals in space was simply unachievable.”
More than 8,000 photographs, thousands of hours of video material, and countless recordings of communications between the spacecraft and Earth during the moon landing are accessible to everyone.
Nevertheless, no one has discovered substantial evidence of interference or confirmed that the images were not captured on the moon.
“Additionally, the Space Race was merely a rivalry between the USA and the USSR,” says Dr. Brown.
Although the USSR achieved several early milestones, they never contested that the USA was the first to land on the Moon, a notable consensus given the political climate of that era.
At the same time, each mission was closely monitored by observers from various countries using radio signals, and no misconduct was found.
In reality, following the moon missions was remarkably straightforward, as a group of students from Kettering Grammar School managed to track Soviet and American missions using just simple radio equipment.
The Apollo missions demanded the participation of a large number of individuals, including researchers, maintenance staff, and security personnel.
At the lowest level, this implies that tens of thousands of individuals were involved in the conspiracy, yet no reliable proof of deception has ever surfaced.
Similarly, none of the claimed arguments suggesting the landings were faked, including those posted by Kim Kardashian, withstand any examination.
For instance, Kim points out that the stars are not visible in photographs from the moon landing.
Nevertheless, instead of being a major mistake in an otherwise perfect conspiracy, this is merely a characteristic of how cameras function.
“Cameras function similarly to our eyes, able to detect both bright and dim objects, but not with equal precision simultaneously,” says Dr. Brown.
During the day on the Moon, the surface receives illumination as intense as a sunny day on Earth, despite the black sky caused by the absence of an atmosphere.
That means a camera cannot take clear pictures that show both the brightly lit astronauts and the faint stars.
Dr. Brown states, “If you’d like to conduct a test on your own, go outside at night, position yourself under a strong light source, and attempt to capture a sharp photo of yourself while also including the stars in the background.”
Although not entirely impossible, it is extremely challenging without significant effort.
- Why do certain conspiracy theorists argue that NASA’s upcoming Artemis II mission supports the idea that previous moon landings were faked?
- Was Kim Kardashian genuinely asserting that the famous 1969 moon landing was a massive deception to her co-star from All’s Fair, Sarah Paulson?
- Is NASA genuinely facing safety issues, or are the delays in the Artemis moon mission increasing speculation about a fabricated lunar landing?
- What disputed proof does Carl Froch present to challenge the validity of Neil Armstrong’s moon landing?
- What makes Elon Musk believe that NASA’s moon mission should be terminated? Explore the debate and breathtaking images taken by the Blue Ghost lander!
jasdooit 
Leave a comment