jasdooit

• Click this link to go to the Scotland homepage for the most recent updates and sports information.

The head of Scotland’s leading prosecution authority was reportedly called upon to step down following allegations of evading inquiries regarding informing.John Swinney over the prosecution of Nicola Sturgeon’s estranged husband.

Lord Advocate Dorothy Bain, KC, faced criticism from MSPs following her assertion that she had completely clarified her omission of a memo to the First Minister during a session at Holyrood last week.

“Everything I’m asking for is basic respect,” she implored, receiving cheers from the crowd.SNP benches.

Ms. Bain also mentioned that it was “unprecedented for a legal official to be requested to provide commentary in this manner regarding an ongoing case.”

ToryMSP Stephen Kerr stated, ‘Dorothy Bain had another chance to be honest in parliament today, but she declined to clarify why she thought it was acceptable to inform the SNP leader about the party’s former chief executive being charged.’

That constitutes a disgraceful neglect of responsibility, and she must seriously contemplate if her role is sustainable.

Last week, it was revealed that Ms. Bain sent a memo to the First Minister on January 19 regarding an indictment issued against former SNP chief executive Peter Murrell.

It stated that he was charged with stealing £459,000 from the party’s finances — a number that remained undisclosed for nearly a month.

In response to allegations that the SNP is gaining political benefits, Ms. Bain had to reject claims of being ‘corrupt’.

She defended her actions from last week, stating that she had notified the FM about a ‘major development’ that he needed to be aware of.

She said to MSPs: “The number is listed in the indictment, and thus, it was a figure I could disclose.”

But she did not mention that she also provided Mr. Swinney the figure in a March 2025 memo, ten months prior to any indictment.

Mr. Swinney also did not bring it up the next day during First Minister’s Questions.

On Tuesday, Ms. Bain submitted the earlier memorandum to parliament, sparking a new debate regarding the documents.

She had to go back to the room last night to clarify her mistake.

She mentioned that she had not reviewed the memo right before speaking to MSPs and she didn’t wish to jeopardize the process by discussing it without being ready.

It would have been highly inappropriate for me to make a playful or uninformed mention of a document I had not previously seen upon entering the room.

She said, “I recognize that some individuals might feel uneasy… however, the First Minister gains knowledge that the general public doesn’t because he holds duties that the public does not.”

Tory MSP Murdo Fraser stated that she had failed to clarify, on five occasions, the reason behind her change in justification for providing Mr Swinney with the £459,000 figure.

He stated: ‘She has acknowledged that the responses she provided to this parliament last week were lacking and inadequate since she had not reviewed all the documents at her disposal. That alone should be a cause for worry.’

Mr. Kerr remarked later: ‘The most recent shocking disclosure regarding the Lord Advocate’s actions concerning the criminal case involving Nicola Sturgeon’s husband smells of controversy.’

Important questions still linger about why Dorothy Bain did not reveal the complete truth to Parliament regarding her questionable briefings with Swinney when she was in Holyrood last week.

That’s either a major mistake in decision-making or a shocking instance of SNP confidentiality.

MSPs ultimately rejected a Conservative suggestion demanding a more detailed statement from Ms. Bain today.

Previously, Mr Swinney stated that it was ‘completely suitable’ for Ms Bain to inform him about ‘confidential’ matters.

Read more