The Middle East is once more experiencing instability. Although geopolitical events in far-off regions affect people’s daily lives, the impact on businesses is much more profound and intricate. When negative factors related to the Middle East arise, companies and media initially examine oil price projections. They discuss how much the price per barrel could rise, where companies’ cost protection measures are, and to what extent these additional costs can be absorbed by pricing. However, in a setting where new challenges emerge constantly, initial predictions often lose relevance. As uncertainty grows, fundamental decisions—like budgeting, procurement, and investments—become inconsistent, leading companies to adopt overly cautious approaches to prepare for the worst-case situations.
A 2023 research paper conducted by Asian Development Bank economists Abdul Abiad and Irfan Qureshi, titled *Macroeconomic Impact of Oil Price Uncertainty*, demonstrated how fluctuations in oil prices negatively affect the real economy. By examining global media content to create an Oil Price Uncertainty Index (OPU), the study found that increased uncertainty in oil prices results in a 0.34% to 0.5% drop in industrial productivity in major economies such as the U.S., Canada, and Japan around 10 months later. Similar to how drivers reduce speed on foggy roads until conditions improve, businesses tend to postpone important decisions as uncertainty rises. The key finding of the study was that the main factor behind declining productivity was not the actual level of oil prices, but the unpredictability of future prices. This inflexibility in corporate investment, production, and labor markets becomes severe when inflationary pressures hinder policymakers from implementing proactive macroeconomic actions, like lowering interest rates.
Therefore, during oil price shocks driven by the Middle East, business executives—regardless of the potential returns of their projects—tend to delay launches and concentrate on obtaining liquid assets and credit facilities. For South Korea’s manufacturing industry, located at the core of global supply chains, increases in oil prices and freight rate fluctuations go beyond simple cost hikes. Disrupted logistics lead to delays in acquiring components, production bottlenecks result in shipment delays, and factories come to a standstill—causing massive financial losses.
To manage uncertainty, organizations should follow three key guidelines. Firstly, view hedging not as a strategy for maximizing gains but as a method to ensure consistent output. Creating a defined approach to maintain production during external disruptions transforms hedging into a form of protection. Secondly, keep cash reserves in place to handle severe situations where oil prices, currency exchange rates, and interest rates all increase significantly. Thirdly, sectors highly affected by oil price fluctuations should aim for long-term fundamental changes—like moving towards green energy or expanding supply chain options—to minimize natural instability.
The real fear associated with oil price fluctuations stems not from increased costs but from the stagnation brought about by uncertainty. Businesses avoid making investments, leading to weaknesses in long-term competitiveness—the most expensive consequence. During times of intense market worry, companies are often urged to respond hastily to temporary price changes. However, during such periods, the biggest error is to lose sight of core values due to fear. Maintaining a steady, principled approach regardless of situations is more important than ever.







Leave a comment